Friday, October 8, 2010

An Important Message from Melanie

Dear Residents:

First and foremost, we do not oppose your efforts to create a Resident Association. As you’ve stated, you have every right to do this. I am more than willing and happy to sit down on a monthly, bi-monthly or even weekly basis with a Representative you choose to speak for your group. It is my goal to make Jefferson at Capitol Yards a place that you want to call home. My request back to you would be that you please keep an open mind and consider our comments and some of the reasons behind certain policies.

Several of the “anonymous” responders have stated how unhappy you are. My question to you is: have you honestly spoke to myself or someone in the office and given us the opportunity to rectify what your concerns are? Please give us a chance to respond to your issues. As an aside, for those of you who may not have considered this, some of these postings may be originating from some of the residents who have been described or characterized as “frat boys” or the “drunks” on the property. There may also be postings from disgruntled residents who are upset due to the letters or notices we have sent to them for various reasons. If I were one of those residents, I wouldn’t like us either. To make a claim stating that we are “horrible management” is a little unfair if you are not willing to give us your name and allow us to help overcome the characterization. I believe that this forum can, and will be, a good thing if the criticism is constructive and coupled with real and honest feedback. We recognize that there is always room for improvement.

Please also know that we have been approached by several residents who told us that they have submitted positive comments which have not yet made it to the blog. We spoke to a handful of residents this morning alone who were very happy and willing to post positive comments to negate the negative comments posted, so we will keep a look out to see if they make it up.

In regard to all the comments pertaining to the guest policy, this is a policy that was implemented for a reason. It is not our intent to inconvenience you or to “violate someone’s privacy” by requesting identification, we are simply trying to control access to the building. We do not necessarily want to broadcast the people that we’ve turned away from the building, but please understand that this policy was put into place in an effort to control the people who shouldn’t be in the building, and so far, it is doing what it was intended to do. We do apologize that it can be sometimes inconvenient for the residents who do abide by the policy. We recognize that no system is fail proof and we are open to reasonable recommendations to the policy.

There is currently a posting on the blog that talks about the safety of the neighborhood. So we have a hard time understanding those that are concerned about the safety of the neighborhood but feel like our guest policy is too stringent. For those of you that oppose the policy, have you truly considered the flip side? Several comments have been made about residents and their inebriated guest(s). As a result of having this guest policy, we have had the ability to confirm who these people are and we have been able to legally ban them from our property. This is not something we would have been able to accomplish had we not had our guest policy in place. Unfortunately, there have also been instances of minor vandalism to the building, this policy has enabled us to track down who the offenders were. Additionally, I have had a handful of residents that have had an unwanted visitor show up and were not granted permission to the apartment due to the resident refusing to come down to sign for them. Again, this is not something that would have happened had we not had the policy in place. There are many reasons why this policy works. Please also understand that although you may not see or be witness to the way that certain situations are being handled behind the scenes, it is this policy that allows us to control unwanted and unwelcomed visitors to the building.

In closing, we are open to listening to your comments and suggestions, we would just ask the same courtesy in return. Please feel free to contact me at mmartin@greystar.com or Michelle Hopson, Resident Services Manager at mhopson@greystar.com. Thank you for allowing me to comment as well.

Sincerely,

Melanie Martin

Property Manager

26 comments:

  1. How about it Thomas, have you been hiding posts from us? That's very naughty!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Melanie,
    Thank you for your explanation and some examples of where the policy has worked. I believe that the policy is well-intended, but a single concierge can't adequately enforce it in a building of this size. While the policy is meant to establish presence if prosecution is needed and enforce responsibility with tenants, there are simply far too many guests who slip past the front desk. It's only a matter of time before the same situations that were resolved or prevented will happen again. I think that a dedicated doorman or security guard during peak hours could go a long way to ensuring that the policy can be as effective as it is meant to be. While this might not be the greatest thing for the budget, it seems to me to be the best way to have the highest level of safety without having residents feel like they are being singled out or that the policy isn't being equitably enforced.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear HouseMother,
    Thanks for writing.
    I will address Melanie's entire letter this weekend, but I want to put something straight right away. I don't censor the posts and emails that I get at all. None. I have never had the occasion to NOT post a letter or comment.

    If I thought a letter was overly rude or ignorant, I might consider not publishing it, but that's really never come up. Most everything I've gotten has been reasoned.

    Let me reiterate. I have publish EVERY post since this blog has been up. I only publish letters to my email when the author asks me to or if they give permission to.

    I don't know who has been claiming what to Melanie -- frankly I'm skeptical--but often people will post things in the wrong thread and perhaps not see them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. TJ,

    I can think of 2 comments I made that were not posted. Both times I happened not to agree with you. Coincidence? Let's see...will this one be posted?

    PS. I use Anonymouse b/c I don't use AIM, Google, or any of the other option offered under the profile. I don't use Facebook or any other kind of social networking for personal use. Of course, you should understand the anonymous anyways since you employ it as well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Snakegriffin, I agree. My old building in Chinatown had the same "growing pains" that this building seems to be having. They resolved the spotty sign-in problem with a doorman (who would actually open the door for us--imagine that, a doorman at a 'luxury' building) and someone at the desk during the morning and evening rush hours--and I think people felt noticed, appreciated, and that their problems were resolved in a less-tense fashion. When the concierge person has to spend 15 minutes digging through the package room to find a package, that means he/she's not paying attention to who's walking in the door. Resolve this issue with more accountable bodies in the entry.

    On a related note, as a woman living by herself in the building, I appreciate the sign-in policy. I also fervently disagree with those who call it an invasion of privacy (seriously?? you must be doing something your mother wouldn't approve of). Management just needs to work on more consistent enforcement of the policies.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for your two cents anonymous @ 10:33. What's up with your dissing? When I post, I post under Thomas Jefferson. OK?

    So now I get it. I thought you were genuine, but now I see you for what you are Anonymous. You work in the rental office and you're trying to get my goat by attempting to discredit this blog. Well have at it. the people in the building know when they post and they can see the results by opening this page.

    Go ahead and forward the two emails "I didn't post" and I'll put 'em up? I played this little game with someone on here before and they couldn't come up with anything. They just "disappeared". BTW I also checked my spam folder and your emails weren't to be found.

    There are two problems with your game however.

    One. I know every comment and email that have ever come through this blog and I know what percentage have been posted--100% Period!

    Two. You are mistaking me for someone who cares about your nonsense. I'm not an ego driven person Anonymous. This blog isn't about me. It's about the people that live in this building getting a chance to express themselves and to interact with each other. I really don't care what side people's opinions fall on. It's all good as far as I'm concerned.

    That is not to say that I don't have an opinion also. When I do I write it down and post it. The vast majority of posts however, come from tenants not me.

    Send me those emails Anonymous.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This nitpicking about anonymity is counterproductive and is really distracting from the main issue. It's also quite pointless to accuse an anonymous poster (which we all are, at this point) of being under the employ of management.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Melanie-you'd make a good politician-skirting the issues and avoiding blame and responsibility. One problem, you're in the customer service biz, and your customers are unhappy! Try responding again, this time stop trying to defend yourself and place blame, and address the issues that are being voiced.

    I had a comment or two not show up but I'm man enough to realize the problem was technical and not personal.

    TJ, nice redo on the blog design.

    ReplyDelete
  9. ....and I would like to know where all these policies are (bike, guest, roof, rental party room, etc). None of these policies are in my lease, have been communicated to me, or in an easily visible area (w the exception of that obtuse and ridiculous ID sign by the door).

    These ad-hoc and ill-communicated rules sound like a lawsuit waiting to happen. Especially since there is no method to how they're enforced.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am not from the rental office and this is no game. I am a resident of 1.5 years who has read your blog since it's inception and largely agreed with your postings. I am inclined not to do so anymore, however, given your defensive and aggressive stance to my truthful email.

    I have sent in about 4-5 comments in the past -those that agreed with you or were innocuous were posted and those that dissented were not. Actually, it is possible that you published one and accused me then of being a plant from the rental office (which seems to be your MO when people disagree) and the other was simply not posted. After I send this I will go back and look to see if this was the case.

    I did not copy and save these on my computer before I hit "post comment" so no, I don't have copies (I honestly didn't see the need to do so - I never imagined I would be accused of proving proof that I sent them). As far as I know there is no mechanism that automatically saves these comments prior to submission.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Has anyone seen the Jefferson At Capitol Yards Facebook page? From what I can see, it doesn't allow for other people to comment. Management makes no effort to gather feedback from tenants - its such a one way street with them - their way, or you're welcome to not renew your lease. So much for trying to create an engaging community environment.

    ReplyDelete
  12. TJ - I went back and looked and I have posted 7 times since Sept, 2009. Two of my comments were negative and both times I was accused of being management (once in this thread; the other was in the I WANT to say nice things...when I said I received my lease upon request via email).

    I also posted a response to the Waste Management thread that basically said taking our recyclables down ourselves is not a big deal and people should quit whining, just do it and stop expecting Housekeeping to do everything for them. Now I could have been nicer about how I said it, but the fact remains it was never posted.

    Now if there was a computer error of some sort and you never received that post, I apologize for my mistake. However, you must understand my suspicion that you are screening since of my three negative comments I was blown off as management in 2 and the 3rd went AWOL....Your response was disproportionate to my comment(s) - you may want to be a bit less reactive.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Man! If other people have sent comments that don't show up I don't know what is going on because, as I've said, I've never ommitted anyone's post.
    Thanks for the heads up though.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous @11:50,
    thanks for writing again. Point well taken, and I extend all apologies.

    I stand by my word however, so I'll have to do some poking around to see what happened. In addition to the posts that you see on the blog, I also receive a lot of email. In those cases I do not post them unless I am specifically asked to, or if I think it's a really good letter, I may ask the author if I can post it.

    I certainly don't expect Blogger to be perfect, and neither am I, but I do take this blog seriously because I know that people in the building have issues that are serious to them. I try to imagine what it would be like to be a single female in a strange city, strange building, etc. That person's safety is a real and important issue to them and it would be horrendous of me to feel that I should be the one to decide whether or not their concern is worthy of posting.

    Snake is correct in saying that this issue is "counterproductive and is really distracting from the main issue." If this blog were simply here to be a hack job against the management it would be not only a worthless waste of my time, but it would have been dismissed a long time ago.
    -TJ

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous and all posters. I think most people fear retaliation in one form or another. After my experience with the leasing office I don't even feel comfortable talking to them after how they treated me, so I'd rather not reveal who I am here for further retaliation. I'd like to meet the happy tenants in person-perhaps they can share how they've made living here a happy experience. I think a tenant community meeting would be a productive way to hear the issues.

    ReplyDelete
  16. DFT and TJ - I agree with both of you and would happily participate in a community meeting.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I don't live in the Jefferson, but instead the Axiom next door.

    I agree with Democracy for Tenants who said about the policies of the building. They're not posted anywhere, we don't have a functioning building portal on the internet for residents to be aware of policies and such, so there's no way for us to keep track of the ever changing rules.
    Besides the fact that they change constantly,they are also never enforced, so no one takes them seriously. A sign in log at the pool, for example, is never going to work if there's no one up there to remind people to sign in.

    I understand the sign in log at the front desk, and asking to show ID, I think that makes sense. Like Melanie said above, if there are issues with guests, they can be identified and banned. I have no issue with you asking my guests to show ID, but having me come down to sign them in is a bit frustrating. This is a luxury building; the front desk should be calling up to me to approve or deny the guest. We pay a lot of money to live here; a good chunk of that was for convenience, or so I had hoped; packing up my two kids to head down to the desk to let my guests in is a bit much.

    The issues go on and on.
    *The elevators break frequently. No, this is not management's fault, personally, of course, but we're still paying a lot of money to live in a building that is often not functional.
    *The frat house style of living, beer bottles left in hallways, etc.
    *I tried to rent the lounge downstairs for a shower once,but was told I couldn't, since I wanted to rent it during the day. Why would this prevent me from renting the room, I asked? Management's response - because we need to be able to show the lounge to prospective tenants. So...you want to show prospective tenants how wonderful the lounge is for tenants, while not letting the paying tenants pay extra to use the lounge? How does that make any sense?
    *I have had several rent checks lost over the past few years. One for over 45 days. I called almost every day about it and rarely got a call back. I also got repeated late notices under my door, even though you're the ones who kept telling me you had my check but just hadn't deposited it yet. I eventually canceled the check and paid with a money order, to which management grumbled and said they couldn't write a receipt for. To which I told you then I couldn't leave the money order in the box. (you eventually did write a receipt, thank you.)
    *At six months pregnant, I was in the garage trying to get upstairs. After 15 minutes of no elevator, I walked to the lobby, where I saw a sign saying BOTH elevators were down. No one had thought to post signs in the garage. I asked the front desk if they could turn on the service elevator for me so I could get upstairs. They said they couldn't, but that I could wait. I asked how long the wait was, and she said anywhere from 30 minutes to a few hours. I'm very sorry, but I pay a premium to live here and not have to walk up 9+ floors with my groceries while six months pregnant. Which is exactly what I ended up having to do.
    *Management never calls back. Of the dozens of calls I've made over a few years, I've had 2-3 calls back.

    See continued comment....

    ReplyDelete
  18. CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS COMMENT

    So where does this leave us residents? I read Melanie's note above, hoping for some sort of glimmer of change. What I see is management trying to justify poor customer service. Residents feel like all management cares about is getting new tenants. There's no one here in Axiom that's dedicated to just the current tenants, and that's absurd considering that this is billed as a luxury building.

    Melanie points out "Several of the “anonymous” responders have stated how unhappy you are. My question to you is: have you honestly spoke to myself or someone in the office and given us the opportunity to rectify what your concerns are?"

    Yes Melanie, my husband and I have been to the Axiom management many many times throughout our tenure here. We've voiced concerns, asked questions, but mostly we can't seem to get in touch with anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Melanie says some of those "disgruntled residents" who get notices or warnings may be complaining here instead of going to them. She's right to some extent.

    I moved in in April. Twice since then I've gotten warnings - though I'm almost never home. Once I got a noise warning for a TV that wasn't even on 5 minutes at about 11 pm on a Friday night. The person delivering said warning didn't hear the noise but said "someone reported it". I got a letter about it a couple of days later.

    I got another warning at 9 pm on a weeknight for loud noises. Since I was cooking, I assume it was pan clanging of some sort. This time the guy actually pushed his way into my apartment to see "what was going on" (very not cool and against rental policy).

    Again, they didn't hear the noise themselves - and again, a letter.

    If management is just going to accept every complaint at face value, it's no wonder there's a lot of built-up resentment here. Just because I have a neighbor that doesn't know how to live in an apartment building, I have to be considered a problem resident. I've never even invited guests over! It's crazy.

    There are way bigger problems than me, and I can't even get heard out.

    ReplyDelete
  20. On the Ground Floor contributed an interesting post. It's worthy of its own post that I will address at another point. The walls here are terrible and create a number of problems and anger. I know first hand because I've been on both sides of the noise issue.

    If this is true, about someone from the building pushing their way into your apartment, that is very disturbing.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Posting again here. Any word from management on when they'll actually organize a meeting to hear out the tenants?

    ReplyDelete
  22. DFT,
    Management doesn't work through me. I set the table, now set up your plan and take your operation to Melanie. She says she supports the idea.
    Let me know how that works out.

    PS. I will collect the emails of people interested in volunteering if you need me to.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I think management needs to set it up. But I doubt managment would want to put in the effort as they haven't before and I doubt they will now.

    ReplyDelete
  24. DFT @ 3:38,
    And why should they? It's not their obligation. If tenants want to organize this is their opportunity, but it's up to the tenants to stand up for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Because its their job to address these issues - and they're not, they haven't, and they should.

    I'll shoot out a time frame and maybe you can post it and we can see if management will come? If management doesn't come, the meeting will just be a live version of the blog - lots of talk little correciton on behalf of management.

    Weeknight at 7pm. I'm open to the actual date.

    ReplyDelete
  26. DFT. I'm in total agreement about the need to have Melanie present at the meeting and I'm sure we're not alone in that thought. If she refuses there's not much to do other than meet without her, but I don't think it sets us off on the right foot.

    ReplyDelete